Here’s my latest contribution to The Legal Satyricon.  I had to put aside motherhood responsibilities and personal projects to comment on Elizabeth Wurtzel’s views on women who opt out of career in exchange for motherhood.  Ultimately, she’s a bitch.  Here’s why.

And raisins will never be represented the same again.  Sun- Maid isn’t the first to vamp up their logos but why did the Sun_Maid girl have to come out looking like a brunette Barbie?

Oh, because that’s quickly becoming the national standard.  I forgot.  (source) 

(Let’s not forget how W Magazine revamped Demi Moore’s torso to resemble the Barbie doll too.)

 Darren Rovell made a good point in his piece “Tiger Ads Continue to Run” stating Tiger Woods’ ads will take on double meaning. 

One reads: what are you made of?

The other: The road to high performance isn’t always paved. (ads)

Good ads in themselves.  It would be good if they continue running.  Their double meaning is a message that certainly shouldn’t be from exclusion.  After all, Tiger Woods is human and a man.  He’s not the first to cheat on his wife, nor the last and while a shame his image was tainted, who’s perfect?  I like that the ads take on double meaning.  Consumers need to think twice every now and then about those they admire, worship or idolize and relate another’s actions to their own. 

To dismiss Woods as a good man just because he cheated on his wife dismisses a slew of private details no one knows anything about.  And, Jester Parnevik places too much pressure on his ill feelings about Woods and his wife, Elin, because he didn’t realize Woods wasn’t as good of a guy as he and his wife thought.  That’s so pathetic.  Who one is “out there” is completely different from who one is behind closed doors many, many times – especially in the world of love and sex.  All good people need love and/or sex and if they don’t get it, they’ll find way to get it.  Get over it or give it but leave Woods alone. 

I don’t condone the cheating on its main point: Woods lied.  That’s ultimately the crime.  The fact that he had sex with another woman isn’t.  Clearly there’s something he and Elin aren’t getting right.   I do condone, however, any damages the wife may have made to his face or car.  The rest is a private matter I find amazingly isn’t being closed.  It’s time for the story to end.

You know, thin might be nice for runway but eeewww on those legs.  If I were a guy I’d be terrified not only to break her tiny arms in half in bed but to get kicked by those goat legs.  Dis CUST ing.  And you thought those models were so awesome looking.  NOT!  So nice to see actually, isn’t it?

Seriously. This is so not pretty.

*Source

I just bought the new issue of W with Demi Moore on the cover yesterday.  Planned to discuss how she looks incredibly hot – and THIN – for 47 -only that her thin wasteline  doesn’t look all that natural, particularly being we’ve seen Demi in a multitude of ways in the past.  A recent article beat me to the punch on the wasteline PhotoShop thing but I never looked at the cover close enough to notice the obvious boo-boo.  Check it out. 

…and I’m submitting a photo to W magazine for a contest they’ve got running.  I’m wondering if thinning my model’s body, arms or hey, face, might give me a higher chance at winning.